Ihre Suche nach:
100 Ergebnis(se) in 0.06 s
-
DUKAS_184130982_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131033_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130980_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130899_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131032_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130895_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131031_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131027_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130972_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131025_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130974_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130891_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130889_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130952_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131029_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130887_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130978_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130885_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130976_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130955_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131046_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130950_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131023_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_181506542_POL
Ukrainian presidential elections debate
April 19, 2019 - Kiev, Ukraine: The second round of presidential elections in Ukraine. Presidential candidate of Ukraine, showman, general producer of Inter TV channel Vladimir Zelensky during a debate with presidential candidate of Ukraine, incumbent President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko at the Olympic stadium. April 19, 2019. Ukraine, Kiev. Ukrainian comedian and president-elect Volodymyr Zelenskiy garnered 73 percent of the vote, with incumbent President Petro Poroshenko receiving less than 25 percent. (Ivan Kovalenko/Kommersant/Polaris) (FOTO:DUKAS/POLARIS)
(c) Copyright Kommersant Publishing House, Moscow, Russia (www.kommersant.ru/photo) -
DUKAS_181506537_POL
Ukrainian presidential elections debate
April 19, 2019 - Kiev, Ukraine: The second round of presidential elections in Ukraine. Presidential candidate of Ukraine, incumbent president of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko (left) and presidential candidate of Ukraine, showman, general producer of Inter TV channel Vladimir Zelensky (right) during a debate at the Olympic stadium. April 19, 2019. Ukraine, Kiev. Ukrainian comedian and president-elect Volodymyr Zelenskiy garnered 73 percent of the vote, with incumbent President Petro Poroshenko receiving less than 25 percent. (Ivan Kovalenko/Kommersant/Polaris) (FOTO:DUKAS/POLARIS)
(c) Copyright Kommersant Publishing House, Moscow, Russia (www.kommersant.ru/photo) -
DUKAS_181506529_POL
Ukrainian presidential elections debate
April 19, 2019 - Kiev, Ukraine: The second round of presidential elections in Ukraine. Presidential candidate of Ukraine, showman, general producer of Inter TV channel Vladimir Zelensky during a debate with presidential candidate of Ukraine, incumbent President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko at the Olympic stadium. April 19, 2019. Ukraine, Kiev. Ukrainian comedian and president-elect Volodymyr Zelenskiy garnered 73 percent of the vote, with incumbent President Petro Poroshenko receiving less than 25 percent. (Ivan Kovalenko/Kommersant/Polaris) (FOTO:DUKAS/POLARIS)
(c) Copyright Kommersant Publishing House, Moscow, Russia (www.kommersant.ru/photo) -
DUKAS_181506527_POL
Ukrainian presidential elections debate
April 19, 2019 - Kiev, Ukraine: The second round of presidential elections in Ukraine. Presidential candidate of Ukraine, showman, general producer of Inter TV channel Vladimir Zelensky during a debate with presidential candidate of Ukraine, incumbent President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko at the Olympic stadium. April 19, 2019. Ukraine, Kiev. Ukrainian comedian and president-elect Volodymyr Zelenskiy garnered 73 percent of the vote, with incumbent President Petro Poroshenko receiving less than 25 percent. (Ivan Kovalenko/Kommersant/Polaris) (FOTO:DUKAS/POLARIS)
(c) Copyright Kommersant Publishing House, Moscow, Russia (www.kommersant.ru/photo) -
DUKAS_181506524_POL
Ukrainian presidential elections debate
April 19, 2019 - Kiev, Ukraine: The second round of presidential elections in Ukraine. Presidential candidate of Ukraine, incumbent president of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko (left) and presidential candidate of Ukraine, showman, general producer of Inter TV channel Vladimir Zelensky (right) during a debate at the Olympic stadium. April 19, 2019. Ukraine, Kiev. Ukrainian comedian and president-elect Volodymyr Zelenskiy garnered 73 percent of the vote, with incumbent President Petro Poroshenko receiving less than 25 percent. (Ivan Kovalenko/Kommersant/Polaris) (FOTO:DUKAS/POLARIS)
(c) Copyright Kommersant Publishing House, Moscow, Russia (www.kommersant.ru/photo) -
DUK10095732_011
PORTRAIT - Nicola Sturgeon
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (9705491h)
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions - Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister of Scotland and Leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP), makes her way to the Debating Chamber.
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, The Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 7th June 2018
(c) Dukas -
DUK10095732_010
PORTRAIT - Nicola Sturgeon
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (9705491b)
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions - Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister of Scotland and Leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP), makes her way to the Debating Chamber.
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, The Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 7th June 2018
(c) Dukas -
DUK10069455_048
FEATURE - Tibet: Land und Leute
(4/22/2017) Monks outside of the Sera Monastery Temple, Lhasa, Tibet. The monastery of Sera, in Lhasa, is known for the discussions between monks (Photo by Sergi Reboredo/Sipa USA) *** Local Caption *** 20844385
(c) Dukas -
DUK10056195_017
NEWS - Das schottische Parlament debattiert in Edinburgh
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (8522092ah)
Tavish Scott makes his way to the Debating Chamber
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 16 Mar 2017
(FOTO:DUKAS/REX)
(c) Dukas -
DUK10056195_012
NEWS - Das schottische Parlament debattiert in Edinburgh
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (8522092p)
John Swinney, Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister of Scotland and Leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP), and Michael Russell, Minister for UK Negotiations on Scotland's Place in Europe or ÒBrexit MinisterÓ, make their way to the Debating Chamber
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 16 Mar 2017
(FOTO:DUKAS/REX)
(c) Dukas -
DUK10056195_013
NEWS - Das schottische Parlament debattiert in Edinburgh
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (8522092aa)
Patrick Harvie, Co-convener of the Scottish Greens, makes his way to the Debating Chamber
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 16 Mar 2017
(FOTO:DUKAS/REX)
(c) Dukas -
DUK10056195_009
NEWS - Das schottische Parlament debattiert in Edinburgh
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (8522092v)
Fiona Hyslop, Cabinet Secretary for Culture, Europe and External Affairs, makes her way to the Debating Chamber
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 16 Mar 2017
(FOTO:DUKAS/REX)
(c) Dukas -
DUK10056195_005
NEWS - Das schottische Parlament debattiert in Edinburgh
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (8522092ad)
Pauline McNeill and Anas Sarwar make their way to the Debating Chamber
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 16 Mar 2017
(FOTO:DUKAS/REX)
(c) Dukas -
DUK10056195_018
NEWS - Das schottische Parlament debattiert in Edinburgh
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (8522092x)
Jackie Baillie and Kezia Dugdale, Leader of the Scottish Labour Party, make their way to the Debating Chamber
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 16 Mar 2017
(FOTO:DUKAS/REX)
(c) Dukas -
DUK10056195_010
NEWS - Das schottische Parlament debattiert in Edinburgh
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (8522092t)
Angela Constance, Cabinet Secretary for Communities, Social Security and Equalities, makes her way to the Debating Chamber
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 16 Mar 2017
(FOTO:DUKAS/REX)
(c) Dukas -
DUK10056195_011
NEWS - Das schottische Parlament debattiert in Edinburgh
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Andrew MacColl/REX/Shutterstock (8522092u)
Angela Constance, Cabinet Secretary for Communities, Social Security and Equalities, makes her way to the Debating Chamber
Scottish Parliament First Minister's Questions, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK - 16 Mar 2017
(FOTO:DUKAS/REX)
(c) Dukas -
DUKAS_20608053_EYE
CHINA-LHASA-SUTRA DEBATES (CN)
(111004) -- LHASA, Oct. 4, 2011 (Xinhua) -- Tibetan lamas debate about the sutra of Tibetan Buddhism in Sera Monastery in Lhasa, southwest China's Tibet Autonomous Region, Sept. 29, 2011. (Xinhua/Tao Xiyi) (lj)
Xinhua News Agency / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http://www.eyevine.com
(FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE) *** Local Caption *** 00753271
Xinhua News Agency / eyevine. All Rights Reserved. -
DUKAS_20608080_EYE
CHINA-LHASA-SUTRA DEBATES (CN)
(111004) -- LHASA, Oct. 4, 2011 (Xinhua) -- A Tibetan lama debates about the sutra of Tibetan Buddhism in Sera Monastery in Lhasa, southwest China's Tibet Autonomous Region, Sept. 29, 2011. (Xinhua/Tao Xiyi) (lj)
Xinhua News Agency / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http://www.eyevine.com
(FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE) *** Local Caption *** 00753270
Xinhua News Agency / eyevine. All Rights Reserved. -
DUKAS_20608076_EYE
CHINA-LHASA-SUTRA DEBATES (CN)
(111004) -- LHASA, Oct. 4, 2011 (Xinhua) -- Tibetan lamas debate about the sutra of Tibetan Buddhism in Sera Monastery in Lhasa, southwest China's Tibet Autonomous Region, Sept. 29, 2011. (Xinhua/Tao Xiyi) (lj)
Xinhua News Agency / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http://www.eyevine.com
(FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE) *** Local Caption *** 00753268
Xinhua News Agency / eyevine. All Rights Reserved. -
DUK10086318_077
PEOPLE - Mode-Legende Hubert de Givenchy im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben
Mandatory Credit: Photo by David Hartley/REX/Shutterstock (1185238e)
Hubert De Givenchy
Hubert De Givenchy at the Oxford Union, Oxford, Britain - 20 May 2010
Hubert De Givenchy, French aristocrat and fashion designer pictured today at the Oxford Union where he addressed students in the World famous debating chamber.
Hubert De Givenchy is a French aristocrat and fashion designer. Having been impressed by the 1937 World's Fair in Paris, Givenchy decided he wanted to work in fashion, and founded the House of Givenchy in 1952. At only 25 he was the youngest designer on the progressive fashion scene in Paris, seeking to distinguish himself by innovation, in contrast to the more conservative designs of other contemporary designers. Givenchy has had clients as varied as Jacqueline Kennedy and Audrey Hepburn, whose professional and personal wardrobe was largely designed by him.
(c) Dukas -
DUK10086318_075
PEOPLE - Mode-Legende Hubert de Givenchy im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben
Mandatory Credit: Photo by David Hartley/REX/Shutterstock (1185238d)
Hubert De Givenchy
Hubert De Givenchy at the Oxford Union, Oxford, Britain - 20 May 2010
Hubert De Givenchy, French aristocrat and fashion designer pictured today at the Oxford Union where he addressed students in the World famous debating chamber.
Hubert De Givenchy is a French aristocrat and fashion designer. Having been impressed by the 1937 World's Fair in Paris, Givenchy decided he wanted to work in fashion, and founded the House of Givenchy in 1952. At only 25 he was the youngest designer on the progressive fashion scene in Paris, seeking to distinguish himself by innovation, in contrast to the more conservative designs of other contemporary designers. Givenchy has had clients as varied as Jacqueline Kennedy and Audrey Hepburn, whose professional and personal wardrobe was largely designed by him.
(c) Dukas -
DUK10086318_074
PEOPLE - Mode-Legende Hubert de Givenchy im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben
Mandatory Credit: Photo by David Hartley/REX/Shutterstock (1185238k)
Hubert De Givenchy
Hubert De Givenchy at the Oxford Union, Oxford, Britain - 20 May 2010
Hubert De Givenchy, French aristocrat and fashion designer pictured today at the Oxford Union where he addressed students in the World famous debating chamber.
Hubert De Givenchy is a French aristocrat and fashion designer. Having been impressed by the 1937 World's Fair in Paris, Givenchy decided he wanted to work in fashion, and founded the House of Givenchy in 1952. At only 25 he was the youngest designer on the progressive fashion scene in Paris, seeking to distinguish himself by innovation, in contrast to the more conservative designs of other contemporary designers. Givenchy has had clients as varied as Jacqueline Kennedy and Audrey Hepburn, whose professional and personal wardrobe was largely designed by him.
(c) Dukas -
DUK10086318_073
PEOPLE - Mode-Legende Hubert de Givenchy im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben
Mandatory Credit: Photo by David Hartley/REX/Shutterstock (1185238h)
Hubert De Givenchy
Hubert De Givenchy at the Oxford Union, Oxford, Britain - 20 May 2010
Hubert De Givenchy, French aristocrat and fashion designer pictured today at the Oxford Union where he addressed students in the World famous debating chamber.
Hubert De Givenchy is a French aristocrat and fashion designer. Having been impressed by the 1937 World's Fair in Paris, Givenchy decided he wanted to work in fashion, and founded the House of Givenchy in 1952. At only 25 he was the youngest designer on the progressive fashion scene in Paris, seeking to distinguish himself by innovation, in contrast to the more conservative designs of other contemporary designers. Givenchy has had clients as varied as Jacqueline Kennedy and Audrey Hepburn, whose professional and personal wardrobe was largely designed by him.
(c) Dukas -
DUK10086318_072
PEOPLE - Mode-Legende Hubert de Givenchy im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben
Mandatory Credit: Photo by David Hartley/REX/Shutterstock (1185238l)
Hubert De Givenchy
Hubert De Givenchy at the Oxford Union, Oxford, Britain - 20 May 2010
Hubert De Givenchy, French aristocrat and fashion designer pictured today at the Oxford Union where he addressed students in the World famous debating chamber.
Hubert De Givenchy is a French aristocrat and fashion designer. Having been impressed by the 1937 World's Fair in Paris, Givenchy decided he wanted to work in fashion, and founded the House of Givenchy in 1952. At only 25 he was the youngest designer on the progressive fashion scene in Paris, seeking to distinguish himself by innovation, in contrast to the more conservative designs of other contemporary designers. Givenchy has had clients as varied as Jacqueline Kennedy and Audrey Hepburn, whose professional and personal wardrobe was largely designed by him.
(c) Dukas -
DUK10086318_071
PEOPLE - Mode-Legende Hubert de Givenchy im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben
Mandatory Credit: Photo by David Hartley/REX/Shutterstock (1185238j)
Hubert De Givenchy
Hubert De Givenchy at the Oxford Union, Oxford, Britain - 20 May 2010
Hubert De Givenchy, French aristocrat and fashion designer pictured today at the Oxford Union where he addressed students in the World famous debating chamber.
Hubert De Givenchy is a French aristocrat and fashion designer. Having been impressed by the 1937 World's Fair in Paris, Givenchy decided he wanted to work in fashion, and founded the House of Givenchy in 1952. At only 25 he was the youngest designer on the progressive fashion scene in Paris, seeking to distinguish himself by innovation, in contrast to the more conservative designs of other contemporary designers. Givenchy has had clients as varied as Jacqueline Kennedy and Audrey Hepburn, whose professional and personal wardrobe was largely designed by him.
(c) Dukas -
DUK10086318_070
PEOPLE - Mode-Legende Hubert de Givenchy im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben
Mandatory Credit: Photo by David Hartley/REX/Shutterstock (1185238g)
Hubert De Givenchy
Hubert De Givenchy at the Oxford Union, Oxford, Britain - 20 May 2010
Hubert De Givenchy, French aristocrat and fashion designer pictured today at the Oxford Union where he addressed students in the World famous debating chamber.
Hubert De Givenchy is a French aristocrat and fashion designer. Having been impressed by the 1937 World's Fair in Paris, Givenchy decided he wanted to work in fashion, and founded the House of Givenchy in 1952. At only 25 he was the youngest designer on the progressive fashion scene in Paris, seeking to distinguish himself by innovation, in contrast to the more conservative designs of other contemporary designers. Givenchy has had clients as varied as Jacqueline Kennedy and Audrey Hepburn, whose professional and personal wardrobe was largely designed by him.
(c) Dukas -
DUK10086318_067
PEOPLE - Mode-Legende Hubert de Givenchy im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben
Mandatory Credit: Photo by David Hartley/REX/Shutterstock (1185238f)
Hubert De Givenchy
Hubert De Givenchy at the Oxford Union, Oxford, Britain - 20 May 2010
Hubert De Givenchy, French aristocrat and fashion designer pictured today at the Oxford Union where he addressed students in the World famous debating chamber.
Hubert De Givenchy is a French aristocrat and fashion designer. Having been impressed by the 1937 World's Fair in Paris, Givenchy decided he wanted to work in fashion, and founded the House of Givenchy in 1952. At only 25 he was the youngest designer on the progressive fashion scene in Paris, seeking to distinguish himself by innovation, in contrast to the more conservative designs of other contemporary designers. Givenchy has had clients as varied as Jacqueline Kennedy and Audrey Hepburn, whose professional and personal wardrobe was largely designed by him.
(c) Dukas -
