Your search:
65 result(s) in 0.14 s
-
DUKAS_184131035_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130982_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131034_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131033_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130980_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130899_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131032_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130895_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131031_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131027_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130972_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131025_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130974_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130891_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130889_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130952_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131029_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130887_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130978_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130885_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130976_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131047_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130955_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131046_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184130950_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
Andy Burnham
Mayor of Greater Manchester
Rachael Williamson
Interim Director of Policy, Communication
and External Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Housing
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
Ruth Curtice
Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_184131023_EYE
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
The Resolution Foundation debate: How to spend £100 billion wisely. Which areas of public investment should be prioritised at the Spending Review? in Westminster, London, UK.
29th April 2025
James Smith
Research Director at the Resolution Foundation
The UK’s record on public investment is poor by international standards – spending less than the OECD average for much of the past two decades. To her credit, the Chancellor has boosted capital spending plans by over £100 billion over this Parliament and put in place fiscal rules that reduce the likelihood of cutting investment when fiscal belt-tightening is needed. But that £100 billion won’t go as far as some might think, with much absorbed by reversing cuts planned by the previous Government. And with Britain’s social, economic and defence infrastructure all under strain, tough choices await on 11 June.
How has the balance between social and economic investment changed since 2010? How can the Government address the UK’s legacy of frayed infrastructure, and support ambitions for growth and higher living standards? Which areas of spending – and the country – should be prioritised? And how can investment be used the effectively achieve the Government’s missions?
Elliott Franks / eyevine
Contact eyevine for more information about using this image:
T: +44 (0) 20 8709 8709
E: info@eyevine.com
http:///www.eyevine.com (FOTO: DUKAS/EYEVINE)
2025 © Elliott Franks -
DUKAS_174655382_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655380_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655379_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655377_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655374_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655372_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655370_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655367_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655364_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655362_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655358_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655356_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655354_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655352_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655350_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655347_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655343_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655340_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUKAS_174655338_LAP
Apple will have to pay 14 billion euros to Ireland
Apple will be forced to pay 14 billion euros in taxes to Ireland after a European court ruling came to light, on the same day that the American company presented the iPhone 16.
Apple se verá obligada a pagar los 14.000 millones de euros en impuestos a Irlanda tras salir a la luz una sentencia del tribunal europeo, el mismo día que la empresa estadounidense presentó el iPhone 16.
News Cronaca -Barcelona, Spain
Tuesday, September 10, 2024 (Photo by Eric Renom/LaPresse)
Eric Renom/LaPresse -
DUK10152534_012
NEWS - Twitter-Zentrale in San Francisco
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI/Shutterstock (13522163a)
A media scrum waits outside Twitter headquarters In San Francisco on Friday, October 28, 2022. Elon Musk has taken took over the company today in a $44 billion deal.
Twiller Headquarters in San Francisco, California, United States - 28 Oct 2022
(c) Dukas -
DUK10152534_011
NEWS - Twitter-Zentrale in San Francisco
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI/Shutterstock (13522163e)
Signage is seen at Twitter headquarters In San Francisco on Friday, October 28, 2022. Elon Musk has taken took over the company today in a $44 billion deal.
Twiller Headquarters in San Francisco, California, United States - 28 Oct 2022
(c) Dukas -
DUK10152534_008
NEWS - Twitter-Zentrale in San Francisco
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI/Shutterstock (13522163g)
Signage is seen at Twitter headquarters In San Francisco on Friday, October 28, 2022. Elon Musk has taken took over the company today in a $44 billion deal.
Twiller Headquarters in San Francisco, California, United States - 28 Oct 2022
(c) Dukas -
DUK10152534_007
NEWS - Twitter-Zentrale in San Francisco
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI/Shutterstock (13522163f)
A cyclist rides up Market Street in front of Twitter headquarters In San Francisco on Friday, October 28, 2022. Elon Musk has taken took over the company today in a $44 billion deal.
Twiller Headquarters in San Francisco, California, United States - 28 Oct 2022
(c) Dukas -
DUK10152534_002
NEWS - Twitter-Zentrale in San Francisco
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI/Shutterstock (13522163c)
A Tesla crosses Market Street in front of Twitter headquarters In San Francisco on Friday, October 28, 2022. Elon Musk has taken took over the company today in a $44 billion deal.
Twiller Headquarters in San Francisco, California, United States - 28 Oct 2022
(c) Dukas -
